1. Many different kinds of living things suddenly appeared
with great variety
2. No links to evolutionary ancestors before them
3. No evolutionary links to different kinds of living things
that came after them
4. Various kinds of living things persisted with little change
for long periods of time
5. Some became extinct and....
6. Some survive down to this dayDo these facts show the fossil record to be creation-oriented or evolution-oriented?
Completely true! All of these point to creation. Even a few quotes from evolutionists themselves...
"The absence of fossil evidence for intermediary stages between major transitions in organic design, indeed our inability, even in our imagination, to construct functional intermediates in many cases, has been a persistent and nagging problem for gradualistic accounts of evolution."
Stephen Jay Gould (Professor of Geology and Paleontology, Harvard University
He himself says that there are no intermediate links for evolution.
"Contrary to what most scientists write, the fossil record does not support the Darwinian theory of evolution because it is this theory (there are several) which we use to interpret the fossil record. By doing so we are guilty of circular reasoning if we then say the fossil record supports this theory."
Ronald R. West, PhD
He says that the fossil record does not support evolution!
"The entire hominid collection known today would barely cover a billiard table, ... the collection is so tantalizingly incomplete, and the specimens themselves often so fragmented and inconclusive, that more can be said about what is missing than about what is present. ...but ever since Darwin's work inspired the notion that fossils linking modern man and extinct ancestor would provide the most convincing proof of human evolution, preconceptions have led evidence by the nose in the study of fossil man."
John Reader (photo-journalist and author of "Missing Links"
Again, the fossil record is inconclusive. It's really led by preconceived notions.
"It is not surprising that large evolutionary innovations are not well understood. None has ever been observed, and we have no idea whether any may be in progress. There is no good fossil record of any. Because they are difficult, evolution has occupied billions, not hundreds of thousands of years."
Robert G. Wesson - Political scientist
He says that there is "no good fossil record of any."
"The only illustration Darwin published in On the Origin of Species was a diagram depicting his view of evolution: species descendant from a common ancestor; gradual change of organisms over time; episodes of diversification and extinction of species. Given the simplicity of Darwin's theory of evolution, it was reasonable for paleontologists to believe that they should be able to demonstrate with the hard evidence provided by fossils both the thread of life and the gradual transformation of one species into another. Although paleontologists have, and continue to claim to have, discovered sequences of fossils that do indeed present a picture of gradual change over time, the truth of the matter is that we are still in the dark about the origin of most major groups of organisms. They appear in the fossil record as Athena did from the head of Zeus-full-blown and raring to go, in contradiction to Darwin's depiction of evolution as resulting from the gradual accumulation of countless infinitesimally minute variations, which, in turn, demands that the fossil record preserve an unbroken chain of transitional forms."
Jeffrey H. Schwartz - Professor of Anthropology
"Darwin himself, ... prophesied that future generations of paleontologists would fill in these gaps by diligent search ...
One hundred and twenty years of paleontological research later, it has become abundantly clear that the fossil record will not confirm this part of Darwin's predictions. Nor is the problem a miserably poor record. The fossil record simply shows that this prediction is wrong.
The observation that species are amazingly conservative and static entities throughout long periods of time has all the qualities of the emperor's new clothes: everyone knew it but preferred to ignore it. Paleontologists, faced with a recalcitrant record obstinately refusing to yield Darwin's predicted pattern, simply looked the other way."
Niles Eldredge %26amp; Ian Tattersall - Both evolutionists from the American Museum of Natural History.
“Evolution is unproved and improvable. We believe it because the only alternative is special creation, and that is unthinkable.”
Sir Arthur Keith - Anthropologist
"...I still think that to the unprejudiced, the fossil record of plants is in favour of special creation."
E.J.H. Corner - Prof of Botany, Cambridge University
There's much more, but many evolutionists themselves say that the fossil record does not prove evolution at all, but special creation.
Look up "punctuated equilibrium".
Also, look at this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tra…
And define exactly what you mean by "kind"?Do these facts show the fossil record to be creation-oriented or evolution-oriented?
Answers by the statement
1: "Sudden appearance" - evidence against evolution.
2. "No links" - evidence against evolution
3. "No evolutionary links" - evidence against evolution
4. "little change" - evidence against evolution
5. "became extinct" - evidence not against Darwinian evolution or creation
6. "survive" - evidence not against Darwinian evolution or creation
Three of the statements argue against evolution, two are evolution/creation neutral.
No no no, you have it all wrong. That's the creationist fossil record which includes giants and monstrous reptilian fish. Most people look to the reality fossil record.Do these facts show the fossil record to be creation-oriented or evolution-oriented?
rubbish .. 1,2,3 are pure BULLSH!T ... phuck off !!!! .. grow a brain
** Evolution is FACT ... Evolution continues .... forever ! ... there is NO god ! FACT !
Doesn't yahoo require sources?
It shows signs of Divine intervention in controlling it all.
Saying something is a fact does not make it so.
if evolution is real, may darwin strike me down...o he cant
No comments:
Post a Comment